Gunung putri: fanatism in the middle of modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/nqtfpv83Keywords:
Modernization, Social Change, Religious Fanaticism, Social Conflict, SocietyAbstract
Modernization is included in various aspects of life and becomes the driver of transformation in people's lives. The Gunung Putri community, with its gemeinschaft characteristics, upholds religious teachings which then form their own identities. The influx of modernization has divided society into two camps, groups that tend to accept and reject modernization. The purpose of this research is to try to present an analysis of this phenomenon amid the onslaught of modernization that entered the lives of the Gunung Putri community. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Data collection techniques used are in-depth interviews and observation. The interviewees were selected based on the principle of purposive and snowball techniques. The results of the study found that modernization has led to social changes both in groups that reject and accept modernization. The social conflict that arises because of differences in interpreting theoretical modernization is a natural thing to happen in the dynamics of rural life. Contradictions in the community did not stop social and cultural changes in the life of the Gunung Putri community. This research is limited to the area coverage only on the study of phenomena that occur in the Gunung Putri community. Future studies are expected to be able to examine the phenomenon of modernization in people's lives with a wider range in the territory of Indonesia.
Downloads
References
1. N. Martono, “Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial.,” Perubahan Sos. Budaya, 2011.
2. P. M. Greenfield, “Studying social change, culture, and human development: A theoretical framework and methodological guidelines,” Dev. Rev., 2018.
3. D. W. Nabudere, “Beyond Modernization And Development, Or Why The Poor Reject Development,”
Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr., 1997.
4. E. Andreeva, Y. Myslyakova, P. Glukhikh, and A. Ratner, “Economic And Social Impact Of Modernization On Cultural Values,” J. Int. Stud., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 193–208, 2017.
5. A. M. Yusuf, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, & Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.
6. U. Prihatsanti, S. Suryanto, and W. Hendriani, “Menggunakan Studi Kasus sebagai Metode Ilmiah dalam Psikologi,” Bul. Psikol., 2018.
7. L. M. Kim, A. M. Muhitdenova, A. A. Kamaldinova, and K. Shakhnaza, “Phenomenon of Social Identification: The Fundamental Problems,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2014.
8. I. E. Putra and Z. A. Sukabdi, “Is there peace within Islamic fundamentalists? When Islamic
fundamentalism moderates the effect of meta-belief of friendship on positive perceptions and trust toward outgroup,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., 2018.
9. O. Aksoy, “Crosscutting circles in a social dilemma: Effects of social identity and inequality on cooperation,” Soc. Sci. Res., 2019.
10. R. Bilali, Y. Iqbal, and A. B. Çelik, “The role of national identity, religious identity, and intergroup contact on social distance across multiple social divides in Turkey,” Int. J. Intercult. Relations, 2018.
11. V. Guliciuc, “Complexity and Social Media,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2014.
12. Y. Nikitina, “Innovative Behavioral Models as a Method for a Social System Adaptation in the Unstable External Environment,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2015.
13. A. Zbarauskaitė, N. Grigutytė, and D. Gailienė, “Minority Ethnic Identity and Discrimination Experience in a Context of Social Transformations,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2015.
14. A. G. Asmolov, “Psychology of Modernity as a Social Situation of Development: Challenges of Uncertainty, Complexity and Diversity,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2016.
15. J. Andersén and A. Andersén, “Deconstructing resistance to organizational change: A social representation theory approach,” Int. J. Organ. Anal., 2014.
16. J. R. Gusfield, “Tradition and modernity: misplaced polarities in the study of social change.,” Am. J. Sociol., 1967.
17. N. B. Ryder, “The cohort as a concept in the study of social change.,” Am. Sociol. Rev., 1965.
18. P. Hancock, “The spatial and temporal mediation of social change,” J. Organ. Chang. Manag., 2006.
19. W. S. Bainbridge, “Religion and science,” Futures, 2004.
20. A. Ghaffaury and J. S. Fadardi, “Role of social psychology in protecting native values in the process of globalization,” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
