Principals’ Personality, Leadership, Teachers’ Job Satisfaction and Students’ Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/c5wakt10Keywords:
Principals’ Personality, Leadership, Teachers’ Job Satisfaction, Student AchievementAbstract
This research is motivated by the gap between the behavior of the principal, leadership styles, teacher performance, and student success, leading to ineffective communication relationships. Basically, the behavior of school principals has a major role, a key and vital factor for the development of the education system towards an excellent school. The purpose of this work was to analyze the interconnection among principals' behavior and teachers’ job satisfaction and analysis it’s roles in figuring the student achievement. In accordance with the objectives to be achieved, the type of this research was literature study by qualitative research approach, with research instruments of an observation and documentation. The collected data would be analyzed employing data collection, the researcher made data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. Data validation is needed by triangulation to ensure the stability and correctness of the data collected and recorded. The results showed that there was an interconnection between the school principals personality with the teachers’ job satisfaction and had a roles in affecting the student achievement. The implications of this finding, which are in the form of data about the effective behavior of principals and job satisfaction, can contribute to the development of knowledge and policies, especially in the fields of psychology and management.
Downloads
References
1. Alam, A., & Ahmad, M. (2017). The effect of instructional leadership , professional communities and extra responsibilities for teachers on student achievement, 31(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2015-0126
2. Alexander, V., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Understanding student achievement in mathematics and science : The case of Trinidad and Tobago. PROSPECTS, 45(4), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-015-9373-y
3. Alhosani, A. A., & Singh, S. K. (2017). Role of school leadership and climate in student achievement The mediating role of parental involvement, 31(6), 843–851. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2016-0113
4. Ali, S. S., Azizollah, A., Zaman, A., Zahra, A., & Muhtaram, A. (2011). Relationship between personality Traits and performance among school principals. Higher Education Studies, 1(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v1n1p38
5. Amri, H. (2016). Kepemimpinan Yang Efektif, (1), 77–82.
6. Ayub, A., Hussain, M. A., & GHulamullah, N. (2018). Causes and affect of work stretch on teacher’s execution in urban primary schools. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 6(1), 81–101.
7. Bakhsh, K., Hussain, S., & Mohsin, M. N. (2015). Personality and Leadership Effectiveness. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n2
8. Bennett, T. (2017). Making a Culture: How school leaders can enhance conduct. London: Open Government Licence.
9. Bird, D. O. (2017). Relationship between Teacher Viability and Student Accomplishment: An Examination of Instructor Quality.
10. Blazar, D. (2016). Teacher and Educating Impacts on Students’ Scholastic Execution, States of mind, and Behaviors. Harvard University.
11. Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors.
Education Evaluation Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260.Teacher
12. Brown, C. S. (2018). Were they prepared? An examination of a teacher execution appraisal to decide in case recognition was coordinated by reality. Issue in Teacher Education, 27(2), 107–125.
13. Buddin, R., & Zamarro, G. (2009). Teacher Capabilities and Student Accomplishment in Urban Basic Schools. United States Departement of Education.
14. Cansoy, R. (2019). The relationship between school principals’ administration practices and teachers’ work fulfillment: A efficient survey. International Education Studies, 12(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n1p37
15. Clark, D., Martorell, P., & Rockoff, J. (2009). School Principals and School Performance (No. 38). Washington, D.C.
16. Commission, E. (2013). Supporting teacher competence improvement for superior learning results. European Commission.
17. Corcoran, R. P. (2017). Planning Principals to Progress Student Accomplishment. Child & Youth Care Forum, 46(5), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9399-9
18. Cylkowski, A. M. (1931). Personality Traits of Successful Teachers. Layola University.
19. Daniel, M. (2004). Doing quantitative inquire about in instruction with SPSS. Assessment & Investigate in Instruction (Vol. 24). London, England: SAGE Publication Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2011.596379
20. Darling-hammond, L. (2000). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement : A Review of State Policy Evidence Previous Research. Education Evaluation Policy Analysis, 8(1), 1–44.
21. Dial, J. C. (2008). The impact of teacher encounter and teacher degree levels on student accomplishment in Mathematics and communication expressions. Baker University.
22. Duan, X., Du, X., & Yu, K. (2018). School culture and school effectiveness: The mediating effect of teachers’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(5), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.5.2
23. Dutta, V., & Sahney, S. (2016). School authority and its affect on student accomplishment The interceding part of school climate, 30(6), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2014-0170
24. Elmazi, E. (2018). Principal leadership style and job satisfaction of high school teachers. European Journal of Education, 1(3), 109–115.
25. Ersanilli, E., Carling, J., & Haas, H. De. (2011). Methodology for quantitative data collection. Eumagine, Emagining Europe from the Outside.
26. Fadeyi, O. O. (2019). The Nexus of Information Acquisition , ICT Use and Employee Satisfaction in Microfinance Banks.
27. Fast, T., Akdol, B., & Arikboga, F. S. (2015). The Effects of Leader Behavior on Job Satisfaction : A Research on. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.159
28. Fong-yee, D., & Normore, A. H. (1999). The Impact of Quality Teachers on Student Achievement. USA.
29. Fulmer, A. P., Boley, B. B., & Green, G. T. (2018). Can You Listen Me Now ? Utilizing Significance-Execution Investigation to Gage US Woodland Benefit Representative Fulfillment with Handheld Radios, 116(March), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvx005
30. Gerritsen, S., Plug, E., & Webbink, D. (2014). Teacher Quality and Student Achievement Evidence from A Dutch Sample of Twins. Amsterdam.
31. Golsteyn, B. H. H., Non, A., & Zölitz, U. (2017). The Impact of Peer Personality on Academic Achievement. Germany.
32. Gull, F. (2015). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement. Journal of Educational and Learning, 9(3), 246–255.
33. Hussain, A., Ahmad, S., Malik, M., & Batool, A. (2017). Principals’ leadership styles and teachers’ job satisfaction: A correlation study at secondary level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(3), 45–56.
34. Ibukun, W. O., Oyewole, B. K., & Abe, T. O. (2011). Personality characteristics and principal leadership effectiveness in ekiti state, Nigeria. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(2).
35. Josanov-Vrgovic, I., & Pavlovic, N. (2014). Relationship between the school vital leadership fashion and teachers’ work fulfillment in Serbia. Montenegrin Journal of Economic, 10(1), 43–57.
36. Karim, A. (2016). Managerial inspriation in the traditional pesantren. UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies (EISSN: 2289-8204), 3(3–1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.11113/umran2016.3n3-1.150
37. Karim, A. (2019). Inspiration, policy and decision maker. In N. J. Beachum & S. Kulkarni (Eds.), In Search of Creativity: A Compilation of International Studies Part-II. Tampere, Finland (II, pp. 34–64). Retrieved from https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=BFhOOpcAAAAJ&hl=en
38. Karim, A., Mardhotillah, N. F., & Samadi, M. I. (2019). Ethical leadership transforms into ethnic: Exploring new leaders’s style of Indonesia. Journal of Leadership in Organizations, 1(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jlo.44625
39. Khan, M., & Shaheen, A. (2016). The leadership part of auxiliary school principals and its affect on students’ scholastic accomplishment.pdf. FWU Journal of Social Science, 10(1), 75–80.
40. Khurram, S., Alwi, K., Rauf, M. Bin, & Haider, K. (2015). Teachers’ work fulfillment and the part of standards for compelling instructive framework in auxiliary schools of Karachi, Pakistan. Research Journal of Educational Science, 3(2), 1–5.
41. Kulophas, D., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Investigating the impacts of true authority on scholastic good faith and teacher engagement in Thailand, 32(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2016-0233
42. Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven solid claims approximately effective school leadership. Nottingham: Education and Skills.
43. Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016). Vital leadership and school capacity impacts on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0035
44. Malik, S. H., Aziz, S., & Hassan, H. (2014). Administration Behavior and Acknowledgment of Leaders by Subordinates: Application of Way Objective Hypothesis in Telecom Segment, 5(2), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2014.V5.364
45. Matsuki, T. (2019). Impact of Workers ’ Values on Representative Fulfillment in Japanese Retail and Benefit Businesses, 2019(Figure 1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4951387
46. Meindinyo, R. O. ., Ibara, E. ., & Tuatongha, C. (2017). Leadership styles of auxiliary school principals and teachers ’ work fulfillment in Yenagoa Neighborhood Government Region of Bayelsa State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(2), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0702026266
47. Mubarak, E. (2014). Leadership behaviors and its effects on employees’ happiness, 5(10), 2010–2012.
48. Mulford, B. (2003). School Pioneers: Challenging Parts and Affect on Teacher and School Viability. University of Tasmania, Tasmania.
49. Naeem, M., & Jamal, W. (2017). The Relationship of Employees’ Execution Evaluation Fulfillment with Employees’ Results: Prove from Higher Instructive Establishing Naeem , Jamal , Riaz, 11(2), 71–81.
50. Oberhuber, S., & Maurer, I. (2015). Quantitative Data Analysis. Text durch Klicken hinzufügen.
51. Othman, F. B. (2009). A Study on Personality that Influences Teaching Effectiveness. Malaysia.
52. Oyugi, M., & Gogo, J. O. (2019). Impact of principals’ leadership styles on students’ scholarly execution in auxiliary schools in Awendo sub-county, Kenya. African Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.71.18.096
53. Paterson, A., Leung, D., Jackson, W., Macintosh, R., & O’Gorman, K. (2016). Quantitative Data Gathering Methods and Techniques. Research Methods for Accounting and Finance (The Global). Oxford England: Goodfellow Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.23912/978-1-910158-88-3-3226
54. Pompilus, E. S. (n.d.). Relationship Of Teacher Performance Evaluation And Student Achievement In The Classroom. Concordia University.
55. Rashid, M. A. ul H., & Zaman, S. (2018). Impacts of Teacher’s Behavior on Scholarly Execution of Understudies Impacts of Teacher’s Behavior on Scholarly Execution of Students. Islamabad.
56. Saarivirta, T. (2016). and student achievement : reflections from Finland. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2015-0146
57. Sabin, J. T. (2015). Teacher Morale , Student Engagement , and Student Achievement Growth in Reading : A Correlational Study, 1(1).
58. Shulhan, M. (2018). Leadership fashion within the madrasah in Tulungagung: How principals upgrade teacher’s execution. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2017-0218
59. Silva, M. M. C. De. (2014). The Affect of Work Fulfillment and Representative Instruction on Worker Proficiency*, 1(1), 30–51.
60. Sirait, S. (2016). Does teacher quality influence student accomplishment? An experimental think about in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(27), 34–41.
61. Smith, B. S. (2016). The role of leadership style in creating a great school. SELU Research Review Journal, 1(1), 65–78.
62. Steinberg, M. P., & Garrett, R. (2016). Classroom composition and measured teacher execution: What do teacher perception scores truly degree? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715616249
63. Tacq, J. (2011). Causality in qualitative and quantitative research. Quality and Quantity, 45(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9293-0
64. Taştan, S. B., Davoudi, S. M. M., Masalimova, A. R., Bersanov, A. S., Kurbanov, R. A., Boiarchuk, A. V., & Pavlushin, A. A. (2018). The impacts of teacher’s viability and inspiration on student’s scholastic accomplishment in science instruction among auxiliary and tall school students. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2353–2366.
65. Tso, G. K. F., Liu, F., & Li, J. (2015). Identifying Factors of Employee Satisfaction : A Case. Social Indicators Research, (123), 567–583. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s11205-014-0750-3
66. Tu, Y., Lu, X., & Yu, Y. (2017). Supervisors ’ Ethical Leadership and Employee Job Satisfaction : A Social Cognitive Perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(1), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9725-1
67. Tzeni, D., Ioannis, A., Athanasios, L., & Amalia, S. (2019). Unique Article Viable school leadership concurring to the recognitions of principals and physical instruction instructors, 19(3), 936–944. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2019.s3135
68. Usman. (2001). Principals personality and School performance in South Sulawesi Indonesia.
69. Weisberg, M. (2016). satisfaction, 7(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1332/096278916X14767760873899
70. Wenglinsky, H. (2001). Teacher Classroom Practices and Student Performance: How Schools Can Make a Difference. Princeton, NJ.
71. Wisse, B., Eijbergen, R. Van, Rietzschel, E. F., & Scheibe, S. (2018). Catering to the Requirements of an Maturing Workforce : The Role of Representative Age within the Relationship Between Corporate Social Obligation and Representative Fulfillment. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 875–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2983-8
72. Yuliarini, S., Kamariah, N., Mat, N., & Kumar, P. (2012). Factors Affecting Employee Satisfaction among Non-teaching Staff in Higher Educational Institutions in Malaysia, (June), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20120001.21
73. Zheng, S., Wang, Z., & Song, S. (2014). Pay satisfaction of employees: A case study of a state-owned science institute in China, 1219–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0554-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
