Between the Motives of Carrying Out Religious Orders and Political Interests

Authors

  • Muh Ridha Suaib Department of Public Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong, Sorong, Indonesia, Email Author
  • Muhammad Hatta Faculty of Law, Universitas Malikussaleh, Aceh, Indonersia Author
  • Ari Purnomo Department of Public Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong, Sorong, Indonesia Author
  • Anggreany Arief Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar, Indonesia, Author
  • Roy Marthen Moonti Departement Of Law, Universitas Gorontalo, Gorontalo Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/asyxwj96

Keywords:

Motives, Religious Orders, Political Interest

Abstract

The motives for the occurrence of criminal acts of terrorism do not stand alone but are multi- motivated, such as injustice, poverty, ignorance and the ease of getting information from virtual media so that certain individuals or groups are affected by the ideas of radicalism and terrorism which are widely spread in various media. In addition, there are several terrorist groups that carry out their actions on the basis of carrying out certain religious orders. Terrorists generally refer to themselves as separatists, liberation fighters, crusaders, militants, mujahideen, and other terms in accordance with their religion. However, the cause of terrorism thrives in Indonesia is not only ignorance, poverty, perversion of religious understanding but the existence of political interests and different political views. In Article 1 paragraph 2 of Law No. 5 of 2018 concerning Eradication of Terrorism Criminal Acts is formulated that acts of terrorism are not only based on certain religious ideologies, disturbance to the stability of national security but acts of terrorism are based on political interests.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. R. Bagun, “Indonesia di Peta Terorisme Global,” www.polarhome.com, 2002. .

2. R. Atmasasmita, Pengantar Hukum Pidana Internasional. Bandung: PT. Rafika Aditama, 2000.

3. Z. Mubarak, “Fenomena Terorisme di Indonesia: Kajian Aspek Teologi, Ideologi dan Gerakan,” Salam J. Stud. Masy. Islam, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1, 2012.

4. A. Schmid, “The revised Academic Consensus Definition of Terrorism,” Perspect. Terror., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 158–159, 2012.

5. J. M. Echole, Kamus Inggris-Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1993.

6. R. A. Pape, “The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism,” Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 343–361, 2003.

7. R. J. Rhee, “Terrorism Risk in a Post 9/11 Economy, The Convergence of Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Action,” Ariz. State Law J., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 435–534, 2005.

8. I. Cahyono, “Terorisme dan Hegemoni Kesadaran,” 2002. .

9. M. Juergensmeyer, Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence. U.S.A: University of California Press, 2003.

10. S. M. Muniroh, Perempuan di Balik Teroris; Religiusitas, Penyesuaian Diri dan Pola Relasi. Pekalongan: Stain Pekalongan Press, 2013.

11. C. M. Bassioni, “Terrorism: The Persistent Dilemma of Legitimacy,” Case W. Res. J. Int., vol. 36, pp. 299– 306, 2004.

12. C. M. Bassioni, “Terrorism, Law Enforcement and the Mass Media: Perspectives, Problems, Proposals,” J. Crim. L. Criminol., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 801-851., 1981.

13. B. M. Jenkins, The Study of Terrorism: Definitional Problems. California: Rand Corporation, 1980.

14. Muladi, “Hakekat Terorisme dan Beberapa Prinsip Pengaturan dalam Kriminalisasi,” J. Kriminologi Indones. FISIP UI, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 1, 2002.

15. A. . Manullang, Menguak Tabu Intellijen Teror, Motif dan Rezim. Jakarta: Panta Rhei, 2001.

16. Council of Europe, European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism. Netherlands: Stasboug, 1977.

17. L. F. Paulus, “Terorisme,” www.dephan.go.id, 2018. .

18. L. Loqman, Analisis Hukum dan Perundang-undangan Kejahatan terhadap Keamanan Negara di Indonesia. Jakarta: UI Press, 1990.

19. M. McAlister, “A Cultural History of The War Without End,” J. Am. Hist., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 439–455, 2002.

20. A. Jainuri, “Terorisme dalam wacana kontemporer Islām: Akar ideologi dan tuntutan aksi,” Surabaya, 10, 2006.

21. H. Junaid, “Pergerakan Kelompok Terorisme dalam Perspektif Barat dan Islam,” Sulesana, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 118–135, 2013.

22. W. Y. Hung, “Review On The World Trade Center Terrorist Attack Fires,” Int. J. Eng. Performance-Based Fire Codes, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 45–49, 2003.

23. U. Johannen, September 11 & Political Freedom: Asian Perspectives. Singapore: Select Pub & Friedrich Naumann Foundation, 2003.

24. F. A. Noor, Terrorising the Truth. Penang: Just World Trust (JUST), 1997.

25. K. b. Thukiman, “Keganasan Antarabangsa: Satu Tinjauan Awal,” J. Kemanus., vol. 1, p. 152, 2013.

26. M. W. Kusumah, “Terorisme dalam Perspektif Politik dan Hukum,” J. Kriminologi Indones. FISIP UI, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 22, 2002.

27. D. Pipe, “What is jihād?,” The New York Times, New York, p. 1, Dec-2002.

28. K. Dikarma, “PBB: Terorisme Seharusnya tak Dikaitkan dengan Agama,” www.republika.co.id, 2017. .

29. J. D. N. Manik, “Tindak Pidana Terorisme,” Equality, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 146–150, 2007.

30. A. Chaidar, “MIT, Teroris ‘Tamkin,’” www.kompas.com, Jakarta, p. 1, 2019.

31. P. R. Viotti, International Relations and World Politics: Security, Economy, Identity, Third Edit. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc, 2007.

32. A. E. Robertson, Terrorism and Global Security. New York: Fact on File, Inc., 2007.

33. B. Hoffman, Defining Terrorism dalam Terrorism and Counterterrorism, Understanding The New Security Environment, Third Edit. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2009.

34. Prayitno, “Teroris di Indonesia Punya Motif Politik,” www.kompas.com, 2009. .

35. A. SB, Darurat Terorisme, Kebijakan Pencegahan, Perlindungan, dan Deradikalisasi. Jakarta: Daulat Press,

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 8 (2020): 24 (8) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Suaib, M. R., Hatta, M., Purnomo, A., Arief, A. ., & Moonti, R. M. (2020). Between the Motives of Carrying Out Religious Orders and Political Interests. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 2653-2663. https://doi.org/10.61841/asyxwj96