Characteristics of Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/4xe5h921Keywords:
-Criminal Acts, Corruption, ExtraordinaryAbstract
Corruption in Indonesia is almost happening throughout the level of government both at the central and regional levels. Although there are various disagreeing parties of corruption classified as extraordinary crimes legal experts generally argue that corruption in Indonesia can be categorized as an extraordinary crime because it is organized, Systemic and has been looting so that it can negatively impact economic growth, legal enforcement and national security stability. Therefore, to tackle corruption crimes in Indonesia, the government has issued law No. 31 of 1999 and No. 20 of 2001 on the eradication of corruption crimes as a legal basis for the eradication of corruption in Indonesia. However, with the issuance of law No. 19 of 2019 for the amendment of law No. 30 of 2002 on the Eradication Commission, various legal experts have assessed that corruption crimes in Indonesia can no longer be classified as crimes Extraordinary because some of the extraordinary powers that KPK has as the spearhead of corruption eradication in Indonesia have been eliminated.
Downloads
References
1. Alkostar, A. (2013). Korupsi Sebagai Extra Ordinary Crime. In Training Pengarusutamaan Pendekatan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia bagi Hakim Seluruh Indonesia (pp. 1–21). Yogyakarta: Mahkamah Agung.
2. Arief, B. N. (1994). Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan dengan Pidana Penjara. Jakarta: CV. Ananta.
3. Atmasasmita, R. (2004). Sekitar Masalah Korupsi,Aspek Nasional dan Aspek Internasional. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
4. Bassiouni, C. (2018). International Crimes Jus Cogens and Obligatio Erga Omnes.
5. Budyanto, W. (2013). Penegakkan hukum tindak pidana illegal loging (antara harapan dan kenyataan).
Yustisia, 2(2), 91–100.
6. Cees, S. (1998). Fighting Money Laundering. London: Kluwer Law International.
7. Cofey, A. (1982). An Introduction to the Criminal Justice System and Process. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
8. Cohen, A. (2013). Prosecuting Terrorists at the International Criminal Court: Reevaluating an Unused Legal Tool to Combat Terrorism. Michigan State International Law Review, 20(2), 220–260.
9. Drumbl, M. A. (2017). Extraordinary Crime and Ordinary Punishment: An Overview. In Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law (p. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Effendy, M. (2012). Diskresi, Penemuan Hukum, Korporasi & Tax Amnesty Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
11. Evans, M. D. (2010). International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Ford, S. (2007). Crimes Against Humanity At The Extraordinary Chambers In The Courts Of Cambodia: Is A Connection With Armed Conflict Required? Pacific Basin Law Journal, 24(2), 127–129.
13. Harun, R. (2005). Polemik Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Masa Depan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Lex
Jurnalica, 2(3), 1–10.
14. Hatta, M., Rajamanickam, R., & Abdullah, D. (2018). Internet and Terrorism in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114, 1–7.
15. Hiariej, E. O. S. (2012). Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Pengembalian Aset Kejahatan Korupsi. In Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada di Rapat Terbuka Majelis Guru Besar Universitas Gadjah Mada (p. 3). Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
16. Hymes, J. T. W. and L. (2012). Bribery and Corruption Casebook: The View from Under the Table. U.S.A: John Wilwy & Sons, Inc.
17. Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2018a). Outlook Korupsi Politik 2018: Ancaman Korupsi di Balik Pemilu 2018 dan 2019. Jakarta: ICW Press.
18. Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2018b). Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2017. Jakarta: ICW Press.
19. Iriani, D. (2015). kejahatan Narkoba: Penanggulangan, Pencegahan dan Penerapan Hukuman Mati. Justitia Islamica, 12(2), 305–330.
20. Ka`bah, R. (2007). Korupsi di IndonesiaTahun ke-37. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 1, 77–89.
21. Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI. (2019). Kilas Berita Hukum dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Retrieved from http://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/kilas-berita-perkembangan-peraturan-perundang-undangan/1942-romli-uu-kpk-perlu-direvisi.html
22. Kovač, M. (2007). International Criminalisation of Terrorism. Hrvatski Ljetopis Za Kazneno Pravo I Praksu (Zagreb), 14(1), 267–290.
23. Muladi. (2011). Statuta Roma Tahun 1998 tentang Mahkamah Pidana Internasional Dalam Kerangka Hukum Pidana Internasional dan Implikasinya terhadap Hukum Pidana Nasional. Bandung: Alumni.
24. Nurdjana, I. (2009). Sistem Hukum Pidana dan Bahaya Laten Korupsi (Problematik Sistem Hukum Pidana dan Implikasinya pada Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi). Yogyakarta: Total Media.
25. Onghokham. (1983). Tradisi dan Korupsi. Majalah Prisma, 3.
26. Pomerleau, C. (2008). Reviewed Work: Atrocity, Punishment, And International Law by Mark A. Drumbl.
International Journal on World Peace, 25(2), 118–120.
27. Pope, J. (2003). Strategi Memberantas Korupsi (Elemen sistem Intergritas Nasional). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
28. Prahassacitta, V. (2016). The Concept of Extraordinary Crime In Indonesia Legal System: Is The Concept An Effective Criminal Policy? Humaniora, 7(4), 513–521.
29. Ramadhan, A. (2019). Ini 26 Poin dari UU KPK Hasil Revisi yang Berisiko Melemahkan KPK. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/09/25/10382471/ini-26-poin-dari-uu-kpk-hasil-revisi-yang-berisiko-melemahkan-kpk?page=all.
30. Rochmi, M. N. (2018). The Concept of Jus Cogens in the Vienna Convention on the Law of the Treaties.
31. Rubio, D. F. (2018). Corruption Perceptions Index 2017. Jakarta: Transparency International.
32. Rugman, A. (2000). The End of Globalization. London: Random House Business Book.
33. Rukmini, M. (2010). Aspek Pidana dan Kriminologi. Bandung: Alumni.
34. Ryan, L. V. (2000). Combating Corruption: The 21st-Century Ethical Challenge. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 331–338.
35. Sen, A. (1999). Development As Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Sukardi. (2005). Illegal Longging dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum Pidana (Kasus Papua). Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya.
37. Sulaiman, K. F. (2007). Who is The Real Terrorist. Yogyakarta: Elmatera Publishing.
38. Tim Penyusun Laporan Tahunan KPK. (2017). Laporan Tahunan 2017. Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
