Mundane Highways or Identity Rich Road Scape: An Element and Location Based Approach to Place Identity

Authors

  • Ophylia Vinodhini G Research Scholar, Associate Professor, C.A.R.E School of Architecture, Anna University, Chennai, Department of Architecture, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirapalli Author
  • A. Meenatchi Sundaram Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, National Institute of Technology Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India, Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/bbwdq850

Keywords:

identity elements, highways, sense of place, character, travel routes, Visual perception, roadside environment

Abstract

Visual perspective of people differs in perceptions and observations of drivers and travellers. The planning of pedestrian environment needs assumptions of how the pedestrians respond to features as they have their planned paths. Consequently, most research interest in public environments focuses on the behaviours of the pedestrians related to those features. There are picturesque and typological studies. Metric, geometric and topological models have established useful in identifying the density and direction of the movements. This paper addresses the social imperative to reconsider the value of features along roadside environment in direct elemental approach. The focus of the research is on thirteen shortlisted elements in a high capacity highway, in the culturally rich state of Tamilnadu, India. The elements such as signage, trees, washrooms, food joints and teashops are ranked based on a questionnaire survey (n=250). Statistical analysis helps to examine the equal probabilities of significance of elements with respect to their occurrences. The research characterizes elements based on natural, cultural, functional, and recreational characters. The functional elements are more significant to people as compared to rivers, historic structures, shrines etc. However, natural, cultural, or recreational elements are more vital for place identity. The research concludes with suggestions on possible grouping of elements essential to stimulate an enriching experience of place identity.

 



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Beritelli, P., & Reinhold, S. (2018). Chance meetings, the destination paradox, and the social origins of travel: Predicting traveler’s whereabouts?. Tourist Studies, 18(4), 417-441.

2. Boriboonsomsin, K., Dean, J., & Barth, M. (2014). Examination of attributes and value of ecologically friendly route choices. Transportation Research Record, 2427(1), 13-25.

3. Chen, S., Saeed, T. U., Alinizzi, M., Lavrenz, S., & Labi, S. (2019). Safety sensitivity to roadway characteristics: a comparison across highway classes Accident Analysis & Prevention, 123, 39-50.

4. Corrales, M., Grant, M., & Chan, E. (2000). Indicators of the Environmental Impacts of Transportation: Highway, Rail, Aviation, and Marine Transport. Diane Publishing.

5. Denstadli, J. M., & Jacobsen, J. K. S. (2011). The long and winding roads: Perceived quality of scenic tourism routes. Tourism management, 32(4), 780-789.

6. Dhakar, N. S., & Srinivasan, S. (2014). Route choice modelling using GPS-based travel surveys. Transportation Research Record, 2413(1), 65-73.

7. Edensor, T. (2003). Defamiliarizing the Mundane Roadscape. Space and Culture, 6(2), 151-168.

8. Fathi, M., & Masnavi, M. R. (2014). Assessing Environmental Aesthetics of Roadside Vegetation and Scenic Beauty of Highway Landscape: Preferences and Perception of Motorists. International Journal of Environmental Research, 8(4), 941-952.

9. Frers, L., & Meier, L. (2017). Resistance in public spaces: Questions of distinction, duration, and expansion. Space and culture, 20(2), 127-140.

10. Huang, YC., Cheng, JS. & Chang, L.L. Applied Research Quality Life (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-019-09727-y

11. Jensen, O. B. (2009). Flows of meaning, cultures of movements–urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities, 4(1), 139-158.

12. Kudaibergenova, D. T. (2017). My Silk Road to You”: Re-imagining routes, roads, and geography in contemporary art of “Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian studies, 8(1), 31-43.

13. Lamsfus, C., Wang, D., Alzua-Sorzabal, A., & Xiang, Z. (2015). Going mobile: Defining context for on- the-go travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 54(6), 691-701.

14. Lean, G. L. (2012). Transformative Travel: A Mobilities Perspective. Tourist Studies, 12(2), 151-172.

15. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place Attachment: How Far Have We Come In The Last 40 Years?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207-230.

16. Lynch, K. (1965, January). The View from the Road. In Annals of the Association of American Geographers (Vol. 55, No. 4, Pp. 629-629). 350 Main Street, Ste 6, Malden, Ma 02148: Blackwell Publishers.

17. Matsuoka, R. H., & Kaplan, R. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and urban planning, 84(1), 7-19.

18. Nagendra, H., & Gopal, D. (2010). Street trees in Bangalore: Density, diversity, composition and distribution. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(2), 129-137.

19. Petersen, E. R. (2002). A highway corridor planning model: QROAD. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 36(2), 107-125.

20. Pushpam, K. N. Evolution of Roadways in Tamil Nadu.

21. Toth, G. (2009). Exiting the „Forgiving Highway “For the „Self Explaining Road “. Project for Public Spaces.

22. Schultes, D. (2008, February). Route Planning in Road Networks. In Ausgezeichnete Informatikdissertationen (pp. 271-280).

23. Shubin, S. (2011). Travelling as being: understanding mobility amongst Scottish Gypsy Travellers. Environment and Planning A, 43(8), 1930-1947.

24. Spartz, J. T., & Shaw, B. R. (2011). Place meanings surrounding an urban natural area: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Environmental psychology, 31(4), 344-352.

25. Vinodhini, O., & Sundaram, A. M. (2015). Issues in Indian Cities Due to Increasing Coverage of Highways: A Case Study of The Sriperumpudur – Poonamalle Stretch in NH4. Creative Space, 2(2), 173–188.

26. Walmsley, D. J., & Jenkins, J. M. (1992). Cognitive Distance: A Neglected issue in Travel Behavior. Journal of Travel Research, 31(1), 24-29.

27. Wolf, K. L. (2006). Assessing public response to freeway roadsides: urban forestry and context-sensitive solutions. Transportation research record, 1984(1), 102-111.

28. Prasad, D.S., Kabir, Z., Dash, A.L., Das, B.C.Prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians: A community study from urban Eastern India(2012) Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research, 3 (3), pp. 204-211. DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.98895

29. Gidado, Abubakar, Korawinwich Boonpisuttinant, Suthamas Kanjanawongwanich, and . "Anti-cancer and Anti-Oxidative Activities of Nigerian Traditional Medicinal Plants/Recipes." Journal of Complementary Medicine Research 10 (2019), 200-211. doi:10.5455/jcmr.20190731050619

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

G, O. V., & Sundaram, A. M. (2020). Mundane Highways or Identity Rich Road Scape: An Element and Location Based Approach to Place Identity. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 2248-2259. https://doi.org/10.61841/bbwdq850