Pedestrian comfort while shopping at the Commercial Nodes of Agra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/y7t4wf18Keywords:
Accessibility, Comfort, Connectivity, Pedestrian movement, Safety, WalkabilityAbstract
People have a pleasant experience of shopping at places which are walkable. Shopping becomes a whole new experience when a pedestrian feels a sense of comfort. This paper will discuss the pedestrian movement at the commercial nodes in Agra, India. The basic objective of the study is to determine the comfort of pedestrians based on their walking experience while shopping. The commercial node studied is well organised and comes under the Cantonment area of Agra. The pedestrian comfort is kept into mind throughout the years of its renovation. The study inferences indicated that the shoppers were satisfied with the facilities provided for them to make their walking experience comfortable. On a general observation the facilities seemed to be proper and well maintained at most of the locations.
Downloads
References
1. Abley, S. (2005). Walkability Scoping Paper. Christchurch: Chartered Traffic and Transportation Engineering.
2. Alfonzo, M. A. (2005). ‘To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs.’ Environment and Behaviour 37: 808-836.
3. Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., Amburgey, J. M., &Szalay, C. (2007). Walkable Route perception and Physical Features: ConvergingEvidence for En Route Walking Experience. Environment and Behaviour, 39, 34-61.
4. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., Tiesdell, S., 2003.Public Places,Urban Spaces. The dimension of urban design. Burlington, USA:Architectural Press.
5. Griffin, K.W. (2000). Building type basic for Transit Facilities.
6. Handy, S., Xinyu, C., Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior:Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part. 427-444
7. Handy, S., Xinyu, C., Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006). Self Selection in the Relationship Between the Built Environment and Walking.Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 55-74
8. Hosseini, S. B., Maleki, S. N., & Azari, A. K. (2012). The influences of access improvements in pedestrian street use. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 645-651.
9. Hutabarat Lo, R. (2009). Walkability: What is it?.Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and UrbanSustainability, 2(2), 145 – 166.
10. Kumar, R. (2010). Walkability of neighborhoods: a critical analysis of the role played by zoning codes in creating a walkableenvironment. Germany: LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
11. Litman, T. (2004). Economic Value of Walkability. World Transport Policy and Practice, 10(1), 5-14.
12. Newman, O. (1996). Creating Defensible Space. Center of Urban Policy Research, United States Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment. Office of Policy Development and Research. Diane Publishing.
13. Parks, J.R. &Schofer, J. L. (2006). ‘Characterizing neighborhood pedestrian environments with secondary data.’ TransportationResearch Part D 11 250–263.
14. R Nath (1997). Agra and Its Monumets. The Heritage Publishers.
15. Sarkar, S. (2002). ‘Qualitative Evaluation of Comfort Needs in Urban Walkways in Major Activity Centers.’ Committee on MajorActivity Center Circulation Systems. Transportation Research Board, 2003.
16. Southworth, M. (2005). ‘Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development’ 131: 246-257.
17. Steve, A. (2005). Walkability Scopping Paper. Available at from http://www.levelofservice.com/walkabilityresearch.pdf. [January20, 2012].
18. Ujang, N., Salim, A., &Maulan, S. (2012). The Influence of Context and Urban Structure on the Walkability of Bukit Bintang
19. Weinstein Agrawal, A., Schlossberg, M., & Irvin, K. (2008). How far, by which route and why? A spatial analysis of pedestrianpreference. Journal of Urban Design, 13(1), 81-98.
20. Jamunarani, N., and K. Duraimurugan. "A STUDY ON CONSUMER BEHAVIOR TOWARDS SHOPPING EXPERIENCE AT HYPERMARKET IN CHENNAI." International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL) 7.5 (2019): 457–462
21. Gunaseelan, Rupa, and R. Chitra. "Customer’s expectation towards shopping behaviour in retail outlets." International Journal of Research in Business Management (IMPACT: IJRBM) 2.2 (2014): 43- 52.
22. TANG, LIBO, et al. "SHOPPING BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS IN US
COLLEGES."International Journal of Business Management & Research (IJBMR) 8.1 (2018): 63-72
23. KHURANA, TANVI, and SEEMA DWIVEDI. "CUSTOMER SATISFACTION TOWARDS MALL
ATTRIBUTES IN SHOPPING MALLS OF UDAIPUR."International Journal of Environment, Ecology, Family and Urban Studies (IJEEFUS) 7.2 (2017): 25-28
24. GUPTA, TARUN, and URVESH CHAUDHERY. "DETERMINANT FACTORS AFFECTING
ONLINE SHOPPING ADOPTION IN DELHI/NCR."International Journal of Business Management & Research (IJBMR) 8.1 (2018): 31-44
25. BHARGAV, SHREYA. "A STUDY ON FACTORS AFFECTING ON ONLINE SHOPPING OF
CONSUMERS IN RURAL HARYANA."International Journal of Management Information Technology and Engineering (BEST: IJMITE) 5.7 (2017): 61-68
26. RAJESH, G., and S. NARAYANA RAJAN. "AN ASSESSMENT OF SERVICE QUALITY OF
ORGANIZED SUPER MARKETS, IN KERALA."International Journal of Business and General Management (IJBGM) 6.6 (2017): 57-66
27. Pinto, Neil Luis. "Understanding the barriers to online shopping among Indian consumers." International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL) 1.3 (2013): 35-44.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
