ANALYSIS OF THE CONFLICT OF TAXATION: EXPLORING MULTI-NATIONAL CORPORATIONS INCOME TAX CRITERIA IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ee196s09Keywords:
Conflict, Taxation, Income Tax Criteria, MNCsAbstract
This study was conducted qualitatively to resolve tax conflicts between Contracting States related to MNC taxes, which are usually carried out with tax approval and resolution related to company income, which is contained in a tax agreement. The goal is to find out the income tax criteria at the company. Qualitative research methods that describe the relationship between conflict and different Contracting States and will be used by multinational companies. The results of this study, found that tax agreements cannot be completed in accordance with existing provisions, due to several reasons. First, the tax problem between Contracting States, each of which has different political and tax objectives. Second, competition arises among Contracting States in fighting over the proportion of tax revenue from MNCs. Third, there is a tendency for MNCs to avoid taxes. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of tax agreements between Contracting States. In conclusion all the criteria related to MNC foreign capital taxation become clear which are stated in the overall agreement n the supervision of the tax and investment authority by the coordinating institution.
Downloads
References
1. Frances, A., 2019. Journal LEGISLATION INDONESIA Vol 16 # 1 - March 2019: 59-75. Title FORMS OF
POLITICAL CORRUPTION Bung Karno University Email: [email protected] Manuscript Received: 11/13/2018, revised 14.3.2019, approved 03.19.
2. Butarbutar. 2017. Hukum pajak Indonesia dan Internasional. Bekasi: Gramata Publishing, 2017.
3. Jimmy, DBO, and Jericho, SA, 2016. Integrity Journal Volume 4 Number Vulnerability December 2, 2018. The title of the Extractive Industries Indonesia Money Circulation Haram "which in English manuscript entitled" Vulnerabilities of Indonesia's Extractive Industry to Illicit Financial Flows. (1). Institute Research Institute (2) .Universitas Gajah Mada), discussed in particular
4. A. H. and Z. A. Muhammadi, 2016. “Multinational Transfer Pricing of Intangible Assets: Indonesian Tax Auditors’ Perspectives,” Asian Rev. Account., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 313–337,
5. S. B. Coutin, 2018. Qualitative research in law and social sciences. United Nations, “International Tax Evaion and Avoidance.” [Online]. Available: http://www .un.org/esa/ffd/tax/seventhsession/ CRP11_Add1_Tax Evasion.pdf. [Accessed: 22-Aug-2018].
6. Bambang., Waluyo., (2016). Eradication of Corruption (Strategy and Optimization), Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
7. OECD, 2018. “Commentary on Article 4: Concerning the Definition of Resident.” [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/tax/transfer-pricing/36221030.pdf. [Accessed: 20-Aug-2018].
8. Lilik Mulyadi., 2015. Journal of Law and Justice, Volume 4, Number March 1, 2015: 101-132. Title: Principles Reversal of the Burden of Proof against Corruption in the System of Criminal Law Indonesia Anchored by the Convention of the United Nations Anti-Corruption, 2003 (The Reverse Burden of Proof Against Corruption Law in Indonesian Criminal Law System Related With The 2003 United Nations Convention against Corruption) ".
9. DDTC, “Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https:
//engine.ddtc.co.id/p3b/index/3. [Accessed: 20-Sep-2018].
10. Dina, Z., 2013. Monitoring of Law and Justice, Indonesia Corruption Watch), Saksl Protection Practice in Germany, www.anllkorupsi.org. Gerald E. Caiden, "The Impact of Corruption Efforts Against Destruction of State and Remedies",http://rudyct.com, Jakarta.
11. Sugiyono. 2013. Quantitative Approach Educational Research Methods, Qualitative and R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
12. Moleong, Lexy J. 2013. Qualitative Research Methods. Revised Edition. Bandung: PT. Youth Rosdakarya.
13. PWC, 2018 “Indonesian Pocket Tax Book [Online]. Available: https://www.pwc.com/id/en/ pocket-tax-book
/english /ptb--eng.pdf. [Accessed: 20-Sep-2018].
14. V. Becker, Sascha O.; Egger, Peter H.; Merlo, 2012. “How low business tax rates attract MNE activity: Municipality-level evidence from Germany,” J. Public Econ., vol. 96, no. 9–10, pp. 698–711, 2012.
15. Adami Chazawi, (2016). Corruption in Indonesia Criminal Law (Revised Edition), the CTK. First, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.
16. Directorate General of Taxation, 2015. “Directorate General of Taxes Ask Foreign Companies Not to Conduct Tax Avoidance,” 2015. [Online]. Available: 08-10-2017.
17. G20, “The Group of Twenty,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.g20.org/Webs/ G20/EN/ G20/FAQs/faq_node.html. [Accessed: 20-Aug-2018].
18. H. Avi-Yonah, Reuven S.; XU. 2016. “Evaluating BEPS: A Reconsideration of the Benefits Principle and Proposal for UN Oversight,” Harv. Bus. L. Rev, vol. 6, p. 185,.
19. OECD. 2015. “Taxing Multinational Enterprises Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS),” [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/ctp/policy-brief-beps-2015.pdf. [Accessed: 10-Oct-2017].
20. M. Faure and A. Wibisana (eds). 2013. Regulating Disasters, Climate Change and Enviromental Harm Lessons from the Indonesian Experience,. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
21. Selasar. 2015. “Globalisasi dan Beberapa Catatan Mengenai Kebijakan Pajak Internasional Indonesia (bagian 1),” [Online]. Available: https://www .selasar .com/jurnal/10764/Globalisasi- dan- Beberapa
-Catatan-Mengenai- Kebijakan -Pajak-Internasional-Indonesia-bagian-1. [Accessed: 25-Dec-2017].
22. Junaidi, I Ketut Patra Journal of Research in Accounting and Finance Indonesia, 2018. CORRUPTION, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND POVERTY IN INDONESIA. College of Economics Muhammadiyah Palopo
23. J. Owens. 2014. “Resolving international tax disputes: The role of the OECD,” [Online]. Available: http://oecdobserver .org/news/archivestory.php/aid/1290/ Resolving _international_tax_ disputes:_ The_role_of_the_OECD.html. [Accessed: 18-Aug-2018].
24. R. S. . H. O. Avi-Yonah, 2012. “Double or nothing: a tax treaty for the 21st Century,”.
25. Matthijs Alink and Viktor van Kommer, 2015. Handbook on Tax Administration. Amsterdam: IBFD.
26. Bernard, LT, et al., 2013. Theory of Law (Human Conduct Cross-Space Strategy and Generation), Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.
27. Oryza, S., and Daskalakis, C., 2018. Integrity Journal Volume 4 Number December 2nd 2018 from the University of Lund Sweden, entitled "Performance Management in the Anti-Corruption Authorities: Indonesian and Swedish Case.
28. Andi Hamzah, Jur, 2016, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
29. Gunaidi, Isnu, 2014, Cepat dan Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.
30. Lamintang, P.A.F, 2013, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia ctk. V, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
31. Moeljatno, 2014, Undang-Undang Peradilan Anak, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
32. M.S. Hutapea, Novelina. 2013. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana (Studi di Kota Pematangsiantar)”. Jurnal Publikasi. Pematangsiantar: Fakultas Hukum USI Pematangsiantar.
33. Nevey Varida Ariani, 2015, Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Dalam Upaya Melindungi Kepentingan Anak, Jurnal Media Hukum, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kemeterian Hukum dan HAM RI, Jakarta.
34. Randy Pradityo, 2016, Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Jurnal Ilmiah, Pusat Studi Pembaharuan Hukum Indonesia, Bengkulu
35. Zusana Cicillia Kemala Humau, 2013, Implementasi Diversi Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Sebelum Berlakunya Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Jurnal Ilmiah, Universitas Atmajaya, Yogyakarta.
36. Widodo, 2015, Diversi dan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia : Urgensi dan Implikasinya, Rechtldee Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 10. No. 2, Desember 2015, Universitas Wisnuwardhana, Malang
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
