The Identification of Argumentation Reasoning in Learning Interpretation in Pondok Pesantren in Kalimantan Selatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ycsxht48Keywords:
Argumentation Reasoning, Al-Qur'an Interpretation, Islamic Boarding School Education.Abstract
The method of interpreting the holy book of the Qur'an carried out by each boarding school has a variety of interpretation models. This is inseparable from the influence of the educational background of the previous pesantren teachers. This influence is also believed to occur in several Islamic boarding schools in the province of South Kalimantan. For this reason, this study aimed to understand the interpretation model of the Quran carried out by a number of pesantren there. To obtain needed data, qualitative method research has been successfully carried out in several Islamic boarding schools. Then the results can be concluded that the interpretation model that is carried out in the South Kalimantan Islamic boarding school including; First, teachers and scholars interpret the Qur'an and other books to the students and their students are inseparable from the model or method of reasoning argumentation. Second, to give an explanation to the students, then they refer to the trusted commentaries. Third, the system and learning content of the books that are referred to are inseparable from the educational background taken by the teachers, both formal and non-formal education. So this finding is believed to not be able to be used as a full benchmark, therefore further studies can be done so that the understanding of the system and methods of our interpretation of holiness in education in pesantren can be increased to be more extensive and comprehensive.
Downloads
References
1. Abdul-Raof, H. (2012). Theological approaches to Qur'anic exegesis: A practical comparative-contrastive analysis. Routledge.
2. Adib, M. 2011. Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
3. al-Aisawi, Misy’an. 2012. al-Tafsir al-Tahlili; Tarikh wa al-Tathawur, al-Mu‟tamar al-Ilm al-Thani li-Kulliyah al-Ulum al-Islamiyah.
4. al-Qaththan, Manna’ Khalil. 1996. Mabāḥiṣ fī ‘Ulūm al-Qur’ān, terj. Mudzakir AS. Jakarta: Litera Antar Nusa.
5. Al-Zarkasy, B. M. t.t. al-Burhan fi Ulumil Qur’an. Beirut: Isa al-Babi al-Halabi.
6. Al-Zarqani, M. A. t.t. Manahilul Irfan fi Ulumil Qur’an.
7. Aziz, M. A. 2015. Mengenal Tuntas Al-Qur’an. Surabaya: IMTIYAZ.
8. Azra, Azyumardi. 2013. “Islamisasi Jawa.” Studi Islamika 20(1):169–77.
9. Azra, Azyumardi. 2013b. Jaringan Ulama Timur Tengah dan Kepulauan Nusantara Abad XVII & XVIII. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
10. Byrne, D. (2002). Interpreting quantitative data. Sage.
11. Berg, Bruce L. 2001. Qualitative Research Methods for The Social Sciences. Boston. London. Toronto. Sydney. Tokyo. Singapore: ALLYN AND BACON.
12. Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection. Macmillan International Higher Education.
13. Creswell, John W. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. California: Sage Publications, Inc.
14. Juthe, A. (2005). Argument by analogy. Argumentation, 19(1), 1-27.
15. Karim, A. 2011. Pengantar Studi Alquran. Banjarmasin: KAPURASI.
16. al-Khalidy, S. A. 1997. At-Tafsir Al Maudhu’iy Bainal Murfaqah Bin Namadzij Wal Lathaif Tafsir al-Maudhu’iy. al-Urdun: Dar an-Nafais.
17. Lapidus, Ira M. 1991. A History of Islamic Societes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Muslim, Mustafa. 1989. Mahabis fi al-Tafsir al-Maudu’i. Damaskus: Dar al-Qalam.
19. Norman, R. (2007). Sexual symbolism, religious language and the ambiguity of the spirit: associative themes in Anglican poetry and philosophy. Theology & Sexuality, 13(3), 233-256.
20. Rapar, J. H. 2000. Pengantar Logika. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
21. Saeed, A. (2013). Reading the Qur'an in the twenty-first century: a contextualist approach. Routledge.
22. Salim, A., & Azra, A. (Eds.). (2003). Shari'a and politics in modern Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
23. Shihab, Quraish. 2013. Membumikan al-Qur’an. Bandung: Mizan.
24. Siddiqui, M. (2014). How to Read the Qur’an? Granta Books.
25. Steenbrink, Karel A. 1994. Pesantren Madrasah Sekolah: Pendidikan Islam Dalam Kurun Modern, terj. Karel A. Steenbrink dan Abdurrahman. Cetakan II. Indonesia, Jakarta: LP3ES.
26. Surajiyo, D. 2010. Dasar-dasar Logika. V. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
27. Warnick, B. d. 1994. Critical Thinking and Communication. New York: Macmillan Publishing Com-pany.
28. Zahir Ibn ’Iwad Al-Ma’i. 1974. Dirasat fi al-Tafsir al-Maudu’i li al-Qur’an al-Karim. Riyad: s.l.
29. Affandi, D. S. (2017, Desember Sabtu). Kitab Tafsir apa saja yang menjadi sumber rujukan ketika mengajar mata pelajaran tafsir? (M. Barni, Interviewer)
30. Affandi, S. (2018, Desember sabtu). Bagaimana metode menjelaskan ayat-ayat Al-Qur'an dengan menggunakan kitab tafsir. (M. Barni, Interviewer)
31. Muhammad. (2018, 20 Oktober Sabtu). Kitab apa saja yang menjadi rujukan ketika mengajar tafsir? (M. Barni, Interviewer)
32. Muhammad, H. (2018, 1 September Senin). Kitab apa saja yang menjadi rujukan ketika mengajar tafsir? (M. Barni, Interviewer)
33. Noor, H. S. (2018, 5 Oktober Jumat). Kitab apa saja yang menjadi rujukan ketika mengajar tafsir? (M. Barni, Interviewer).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
