Maximizing Learning Opportunities in the Teaching of ESL for PUC Students at RGUKT-Basar’s Digital Classrooms: A Comparative Study of Conventional and Digital Classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/v67s3b39Keywords:
Personal construct,, ICT, maximizing learning opportunities, Web based technology, Conventional classroom v/s digital classroomAbstract
This paper discusses how the ICT enabled classrooms promote language competence with reference to the teaching of English as a second language to the students in the southern Asian countries like India. It is hypothesised that the use of ICT maximises the scope of learning opportunities in acquiring LSRW skills in an ESL context in comparison with the conventional mode of teaching. Moreover the conventional mode of teaching and learning has limitations owing to cultural, geographical, social, economic, and pragmatic usage of language. It is a hard nut to crack for teachers to teach LSRW skills effectively in such circumstances. It calls for the use of appropriate illustrations, use of suitable activities etc. As learning is primarily a complex process, the inventions of 21st century technology in teaching and learning especially in Indian ESL context, throw up several challenges for teachers in maximizing the learning opportunities with the growing demand. The present study attempts to maximise the learning opportunities in acquiring language skills using ICT. The target students are pursuing their Pre University Course (PUC) at RGUKT-Basar, one of the reputed institutes in the state of Telangana in India. The data has been collected from a diagnostic test conducted on role-play topics administered to 70 students. The students have been divided into two groups A) Conventional classroom learners (30) and B) Digital classroom learners (40). The classification was made based on their medium of instruction, and kind of classroom provided. The findings from the study show that digital classroom learners performed better in several speaking activities for both the group of learners based on the module selected from the prescribed syllabus by the Board of Intermediate.
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, Jameel (2010). Media Technology and English Language Teaching. A.P.H. Publishing corporation page: 1
2. Antony, A. (1993). Teaching of English as a Second Language in India. Prakash book Depot, Bareilly Page: 131, 133, 134.
3. A. I., Ibrahim, ‘Information & Communication Technologies in ELT.’ Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 211-214
(2010).
4. Barron, A. (1998). Designing Web-based training.British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 29, No. (4), Pp; 355-371.
5. Bhattacharya, I. & Sharma, K. (2007), 'India in the knowledge economy – an electronic paradigm', International Journal of Educational Management Vol. 21 No. 6, Pp. 543- 568.
6. Collins, A. (1996). “Design issues for learning environments”. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (Pp. 347–361). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. S. C., Yang, & Y. J., Chen, ‘Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study.’ Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1),
860-879 (2007).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.015
8. Chunjian, Z (2009).Application of multimedia in English Teaching and learning. Journal of Technology for ELT.
9. Davis, R. (2006). “Utopia or Chaos?The Impact of Technology on Language Teaching”. The Internet TESL Journal. Retrieved August 10, 2012 from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Davis- ImpactOfTechnology.html
10. M., Hashemi, & M., Aziznezhad, ‘Computer Assisted Language Learning Freedom or Submission to Machines?’ Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 832-835 (2011a). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.152
11. Hannafin, M. J., Hall, C., Land, S., & Hill, J. (1994). “Learning in open-ended environments: assumptions, methods and implications”.Educational Technology, Vol. 34 No. (8), Pp: 48–55.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
