Investigating Pharmacists’ Perceived Organizational Performance through Learning and Innovation under the Moderating Role of Power Distance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/pak09y25Keywords:
Perceived Organizational Performance, Organizational Learning, Organizational Innovation, PharmacistsAbstract
This study investigated the perspective of pharmacists regarding organizational learning and innovation for perceived organizational performance under the moderating role of power distance. The said investigation was pursued under knowledge based theory to analyze the need of new learning and innovation in pharmaceutical sector for dissemination of knowledge for effective performance in accordance with culture. The data was collected through adopted questionnaire in time lags from pharmacists working at middle tier of pharmaceutical sector across major cities of Pakistan. Out of 400 distributed questionnaires, 271 were completely responded. Statistical techniques were applied through SPSS and SMART PLS soft wares to analyze the respondents’ feedback. The results showed that organization learning and organization innovation were positively related to perceived organizational performance. Subsequently, power distance culture moderated the hypothesized relationships. Thus, implications were made for managers and policy makers in order to further strengthen the pharmaceutical sector of Pakistan.
Downloads
References
1. Arslan, A., & Staub, S. (2013). Theory X and Theory Y Type Leadership Behavior and its Impact on Organizational Performance: Small Business Owners in the Sushane Lighting and Chandelier District. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, (75), 102-111.
2. Allworth, Elizabeth, and Beryl Hesketh. “Construct-Oriented Biodata: Capturing Change- Related and Contextually Relevant Future Performance.” International Journal of Selection and Assessment, vol. 7, no. 2, June 1999, pp. 97–111, 10.1111/1468-2389.00110.
3. Awang, Z., Ahmad, J. H., & Zin, N. M. (2010). Modelling job satisfaction and work commitment among lecturers: a case of UITM kelantan. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 1(2), 45-59.
4. Abbasi, M. U., Sohail, M., Cheema, F., & Syed, N. A. (2010). Talent Management as Success Factor for Organizational Performance: A Case of Pharmaceutical Industry in Pakistan. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 6(2), 74-83.
5. Burnes, B. (2014). Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organizational Dynamics. New Jersey: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
6. Battaglia, M. P. (2008). Nonprobability sampling, encyclopedia of survey research meth- ods. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
7. Bruner, j. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard educational review, 31, 21-32.
8. Bandura, a. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological review, 84, 191-215. 9.
10. Crossan, M., M. Lane, H. W.White, R. E. (1999): An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution, in: Academy of Management Review, 24, 3, 522-537.
11. Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management journal, 39(4),949-969.
12. Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in international Comparative Management, 3, 127–150.
13. . Edmondson, A. (1999), “Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 350-383.
14. Gracia-Morales, V.J. Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level or organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sector. Journal of Organizational Change Management 2008; 21(2), 188-212
15. Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., and Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 83 (3), 109-116
16. Huber, G. P. (1991). “Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures, Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.88–115
17. Hair, Jr.,J.F., Anderson. R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C, ( 2006). Multivariate data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Prentice Hall.
18. Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7, 5, 502- 518
19. Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, 71 - 79.
20. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strategic management journal, 4(3), 221-235.
21. Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Pres, New York, NY.
22. Tung, R. L., Walls, J., & Frese, M. (2007). Cross-cultural entrepreneurship: the case of China. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
23. Uzkurt,C.,Kumar. R., Kimzan.S.H., & Eminoglu.G. (2013). Role of innovationin the relationship between organizational culture and firm performance. European Journal of InnovationManagement, 92-117.
19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Yammarino, F. J./Dansereau, F. (2010): Multilevel issues in organizational culture and climate research. in: N. M. Ashkanashy, C. P. M. Wilderom & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), The handbook of organizational culture and climate Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Zare, R., Jajarmizadeh, M., & Abbasi, N. (2010). Relation Between Job Characteristics Model(JCM) and Learning Organization (LO). World Applied Sciences Journal, 8(10), 1253-1259.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
