Representation of Pollution in Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Newspapers’ Headlines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/8c9ce814Keywords:
Smog, Pollution, Fog, Discourse Analysis, Representation, Climate ChangeAbstract
This paper critically decodes the newspapers’ post titles to highlight how same event is represented differently by print media through their headlines. The present study attempts to locate how discursive techniques are employed differently by different newspapers to propagate desired ideologies to the target readership regarding the representation of smog phenomenon. In this regard four Pakistani English Daily (The Dawn, The News International, Pakistan Today, The Express Tribune) and four Indian English Daily (Hindustan Times, The Hindu, The Times of India, The Indian Express) have randomly been selected to show how Environmental changes are discursively represented by different ideological groups. The news on the selected issue published in 2017 and 2018 have been randomly selected for analysis. The present research employs Van Dijk’s (2004) Socio Cognitive model to critically analyze the use of different linguistics moves to represent an event accordingly. It suggests that language is one of the best sites to invest ideology and to shape the mindset of the target audience. This research model has been made operational through inclusion and exclusion process. Some of the analytical categories, missing in the existing data have been excluded. The findings of the research suggest how print media discourses are used as an insidious weapon to represent same event differently. This is how the concept of linguistic solidarity and distance is played up. The post titles of print media propagate different worldviews by camouflaging one thing at the cost of other.
Downloads
References
1. Bell, A. (1994). Climate of Opinion: Public and Media Discourse on the Global Environment. Discourse & Society, 5(1), 33-64. doi:10.1177/0957926594005001003
2. Carvalho, A. (2008). Media (ted) Discourse and Society. in Journalism Studies 9(2):161-177
3. Cynk, K. W. (2018). The process of climate change in mass media discourse using the example of Polish and international editions of “Newsweek” magazine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(31), 31439-31449. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3138-0
4. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
5. Gunster, S., Fleet, D., Paterson, M., & Saurette, P. (2018). Climate Hypocrisies: A Comparative Study of News Discourse. Environmental Communication, 12(6), 773-793. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1474784
6. Hey, L., & Holloway, S. (Eds.). (2015). Pollution [Def. 2]. In Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary (Ninth ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Hout, T. V., & Cotter, C. (2015). Print Media Discourse. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1-6. doi:10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi187
8. Koteyko, N., & Atanasova, D. (2016). Discourse Analysis in Climate Change Communication. Oxford
Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.489
9. Mala. (2010, June 20). Aims and objectives of Starting a Newspaper. Retrieved from https:
//www.indiastudychannel.com/resources/117868-Aims-objectives-Starting-Newspaper.aspx
10. Michellington. (2016, May 06). What is Media Discourse? Retrieved from https:// michellephe landkit
.wordpress.com/2016/02/17/what-is-media-discourse/
11. Mojadam, M., Matlabi, M., Haji, A., Cheraghi, M., Bitaraf, S., & Khafaie, M. A. (2018). Khuzestan dust phenomenon: A content analysis of most widely circulated newspapers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(16), 15918-15924. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1833-5
12. O’Keeffe, A. (2012). Media and Discourse Analysis in Gee, J. P. & Handford, M. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (First Edition, pp 441-454). New York and London: Routledge.
13. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. (2015).
14. Tilt, B., & Xiao, Q. (2010). Media coverage of environmental pollution in the People’s Republic of China: Responsibility, cover-up and state control. Media, Culture & Society, 32(2), 225-245. doi:10.1177/0163443709355608
15. Trčková, D. (2014). Representations of natural catastrophes in newspaper discourse. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
16. Van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage Publication.
17. Wodak, R. (2001). The Discourse-historical Approach. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 63–94). London: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
