The Grey behind the Golden: A Case Study of Sikkim’s Development Paradox
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/dgk99144Keywords:
Human development, Suicide, drug abuse, unemploymentAbstract
When ones living place is not able to generate conducive environment for the fulfilment of the aims and aspirations of its people, it generates disharmony. People are the ones which make a place alive; unfortunately, in case of Sikkim what is falling apart is its people. Topping the ladder in terms of development indicators does not always show the ground reality. Sikkim is dangerously juxtaposed between “highs” and “lows” of development. The state has a literacy rate of 81.42% (Census of India, 2011) which is markedly higher than national average literacy rate of 74.04% (Census of India, 2011), a young favouring demographic profile where almost 47.9% are below the age of 25 years, dubious distinction of ranking second (after Tripura) in unemployment rate, increasing trend of fresh HIV cases, ranking first in the country in suicides committed, a higher rate of suicides among young people. Finally, there is an imbalance between the high economic development witnessed by the state and the jobs creation, the aspirations of the people. The gap in this mismatch is the last leg of development dilemma that the state most urgently needs to bridge. Understanding the pernicious triad of unemployment, suicide, drug abuse is thus essential in Sikkim. Through this study a comprehensive document can be generated which is able to highlight the lacunas and strength of the State’s approach towards a comprehensive resolution of the problem in Sikkim and the information further can be used for devising a working model to deal with the state’s agony.
Downloads
References
1. Kukleys, W. (2005), AmartyaSen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
2. India HIV Estimation Report 2015: Technical Report, National AIDS Control Organization, National Institute of Medical Statistics, Government of India.
3. WHO. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
4. Patel V, Chatterji S, Chisholm D, et al. Chronic diseases and injuries in India. Lancet 2011; 377: 413–28.
5. Meier RF, Clinard MB. Sociology of Deviant Behaviour. 14th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning; 2008. p. 169.
6. Radhakrishnan R, Andrade C. Suicide: An Indian perspective. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012; 54:304–
19. [PMCID: PMC3554961] [PubMed: 23372232]
7. Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India 1990. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 1992. National Crime Records Bureau.
8. Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India 2008. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2010. National Crime Records Bureau.
9. Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India 2007. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2009. National Crime Records Bureau.
10. Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India 2006. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2008. National Crime Records Bureau.
11. Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India; 2015. National Crime Records Bureau.
12. Panda S. Suicide in Sikkim: Issues and prevention. Indian J Psychol Sci. 2014;5:151–7
13. Radhakrishnan R, Andrade C. Suicide: An Indian perspective. Indian J Psychiatry. 2012;54:304–
19. [PMCID: PMC3554961] [PubMed: 23372232]
14. Chhetri, Gurung and Singh,Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct-Dec; 58(4): 448–453.doi: 10.4103/0019- 5545.196712
15. LaveeshBhandari,MinakshiChakraborty, Spatial Poverty in Sikkim,Sikkim Now, January 2015.
16. Chang SS, Gunell D, Sterne JAC, Lu T, Cheng ATA. Was the economic crisis 1997-1998 responsible for rising suicide rates in East/Southeast Asia? A time-trend analysis for Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Thailand. SocSci Med 2009; 68: 1322–31.
17. International Monetary Fund. Working paper. Financial crises: Explanations, types and implications: International Monetary Fund, 2013
18. International Labour Organization. Global employment trends 2014. Risk of jobless recovery? Geneva: International Labour Force, 2014.
19. Barr B, Taylor-Robinson D, Scott-Samuel A, McKee M, Stuckler D. Suicides associated with the 2008–10 economic recession in England: time trend analysis. BMJ 2012; 345: e5142.
20. Fountoulakis KN, Kawohl W, Theodorakis PN, et al. Relationship of suicide rates to economic variables in Europe: 2000–2011. Br J Psychiatry 2014; 205: 486–96.
21. Pompili M, Vichi M, Innamorati M, et al. Suicide in Italy during a time of economic recession: some recent data related to age and gender based on a nationwide register study. Health Soc Care Community 2014; 22: 361–67.
22. Classen TJ, Dunn RA. The effect of job loss and unemployment duration on suicide risk in the United States: a new look using mass-layoff s and unemployment duration. Health Econ 2012; 21: 338–50.
23. State Socio- Economic Census, 2006, Department of Economics, Statistics, Monitoring and Evaluation.
24. Base Line Survey of Border Areas, 2010, Department of Economics, Statistics, Monitoring and Evaluation.
25. Sikkim: Human Development Report 2014, Government of Sikkim, Routeldge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
