Factors Affecting the Quality of Education: A Comparison Study in Vocational High School in East Java
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/qx0st152Keywords:
Learning model, vocational school, quality of educationAbstract
The purpose of this study is two-fold, the first objective is to understand how to use the learning model in office administration vocational schools. In addition, this study is intended to improve the quality of education in vocational schools in Indonesia. The research was carried out at the state vocational school in the office administration department in Surabaya and Sidoarjo of East Java in Indonesia. The data were gathered through questionnaires to the respondents, while the data were analyzed using t-test. The findings showed that there were significant differences in the performance criteria and the learning model mechanism. Furthermore, there are several differences in two vocational schools including teacher education backgrounds, characteristics of students, and learning environments. The existing differences can be used to improve the quality of education, especially teacher competencies in implementing effective learning process that become a benchmark for the succeed of education.
Downloads
References
[1] Abidin, Y. (2016). Learning System Design in the Context of 2013 Curriculum. Bandung: PT.Refika Aditama.
[2] Alma, B. (2009). Professional Teachers (Mastering Methods and Teaching Skills). Bandung: PT. Alfabeta.
[3] Damirchili, F., & Tajari, M. (2011). Explaining internal factors effective on educational quality improvement based on views of students from Zanjan Azad universities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 363-366.
[4] Daramadi. (2017). Development of Models and Learning Methods in the Dynamics of Student Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Dalam.
[5] Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 14(1), 4–58
[6] Dunn, A. H., Sondel, B., and Baggett, H. C. (2019). I don’t want to come out as pushing an agenda: How contexts shaped teachers’ pedagogy in the days after the 2016 U.S. presidential election. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 444-476.
[7] Emiliasari, R. N. (2018). An Analysis of Teachers’ pedagogical Competence In Lesson Study Of Mgmp Smp Majalengka. Eltin Journal, Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 6(1), 22-33.
[8] Fejes, A., & Köpsén, S. (2014). Vocational teachers’ identity formation through boundary crossing. J. Educ. Work, 27(3), 265–283.
[9] Ghariblaki, Z., & Poorahmadi, M. (2017). The effect of recast vs. clarification request as two types of corrective feedback on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners' Structural Knowledge. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 87-96.
[10] Goldhaver, D., & Anthony, E. (2004). Can Teacher Quality Be Effectively Assessed. Seattle: Center for Reivnenting Education.
[11] Grollmann, P. (2008). The quality of vocational teachers: Teacher education, institutional roles and professional reality. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 535-547.
[12] Inoue, M., & English, M. (2014). Compulsory English Education: Teachers' Experience of Elementary and Junior High Schools in. International Journal of Art and Sciences, 7(6), 107–148.
[13] Ma, V., & Ma, X. (2014). A comparative analysis of relationship between learning styles and mathematics performance. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 3.
[14] Narmaditya, B. S., Wulandari, D., & Sakarji, S. R. B. (2018). Does Problem-based Learning Improve Critical Thinking Skill?. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 378-388.
[15] Nasution, W. N. (2017). The Effects of Learning Models and Achievement Motivation on Natural Science Learning Outcomes of Students at Islamic State Elementary Schools in Medan, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 131–150.
[16] Nurbudiyani, I. (2013). Implementation of Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Spatial Measurements in Social Sciences Class III at Muhammadiyah Elementary School Palangkaraya. Education, 8(2), 14-20.
[17] Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing Teaching Effectiveness and Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33.
[18] Purwanto. (2010). Evaluation of Learning Outcomes. Yogyakarta: Learning Center.
[19] Radovan, M., & Makovec, D. (2015). Adult learners' learning environment and satisfaction in formal education-case study of four East-European countries. International Education Studies, 8(2), 101–112.
[20] Ruja, I. N., & Sukamto. (2015). Survey Permasalahan Implementasi Kurikulum Nasional 2013 Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Jawa Timur. Sejarah dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya, 9(2), 193-199.
[21] Saefulbahri, A. (2015). The Influence of Learning Guided Findings Model of Student Learning Outcomes.
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(3), 3–5
[22] Saptono, A., Wibowo, A., Narmaditya, B.S., Kusumojanto, D.D., & Hermawati, M. (2019). Determinant Factors of Development Entrepreneurial Education: Lesson From High School in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12), 2837-2843.
[23] Sugiyo, R., & Purwastuti, L. A. (2017). Local wisdom-based character education model in elementary school in Bantul Yogyakarta Indonesia. Sino-US English Teaching, 14(5), 299-308.
[24] Suratman, B., Wulandari, S. S., Nugraha, J., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2020). Does Teacher Certification Promote Work Motivation and Teacher Performance? A Lesson from Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(10), 516-525.
[25] Susanto, A. (2015). Theory of Learning and Learning in Elementary School. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
[26] Suyatno, A. J. (2013). Being a Professional Teacher Strategy enhances the Qualifications and Quality of Teachers in the Era of Globalization Jakarta: Erlangga.
[27] Trisno, B., & Nurdianto, D. (2015). The key factors affecting internal quality education services in secondary vocational schools. In 3rd UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training. Atlantis Press., 43-45.
[28] Warsita, B. (2008). Learning technologies. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
