The Impacts of Scaffolding on Metacognition and Students’ Ability of Essays Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/103pb011Keywords:
essay writing, learning, metacognition, scaffoldingAbstract
This study aimed to examine and describe the effect of scaffolding on the metacognition of writing knowledge and the students’ ability to write essays. The research design used was quasi-experiment with pretest and posttest designs. The independent variable of this study was scaffolding learning and the dependent variables were the metacognition of writing knowledge and the students’ ability to write essays. The research sample consisted of two groups, which were the experimental class and the control class. The results showed that in general scaffolding writing learning (1) had a significant negative effect on metacognition of writing knowledge of students (sig. 0.012) and (2) significantly positive effect on students’ ability of essays writing (0.001). Implications and future research are also discussed.
Downloads
References
[1] Abrar, M., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Asyrafi, F., Makmur, M., & Marzulina, L. (2018). “If our english isn’t a language, what is it?" indonesian EFL student teachers’ challenges speaking english. Qualitative Report, 23(1), 129-145.
[2] Ahangaria, S. Hejazi, M., & Razmjouc, L. (2014). The Impact of scaffolding on content retention of iranian post-elementary EFL learners’ summary writing. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 83 – 89 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.392.
[3] Aktur, A. O., & Sahin, I. (2011) Literature review on metacognition and its measurement, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3731-3736.
[4] Astrid, A., Marzulina, L., Erlina, D., Harto, K., Habibi, A., & Mukminin, A. (2019). Teaching writing to efl student teachers: Teachers' intervention and no teachers' intervention through peer feedback writing techniques. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1901-1908. doi:10.13189/ujer.2019.070908
[5] Baradaran, A. & Sarfarazi, B. (2011). The impact of scaffolding on the Iranian efl learners’ English academic writing, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 5, (12), 2265-2273.
[6] Bigdeli, R. A. (2015) Impact of scaffolding on complexity and accuracy of Iranian efl learners’ narrative writing,
Global Journal of Foreign language Teaching, 5, (2), 143-156.
[7] Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2014). Scaffolding collaborative reflective writing in a vet curriculum, Springer Science, Vocational and Learning. DOI 10.1007/s12186-9110-3
[8] Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative And, Qualitative Research. — 4th ed. Boston: Pratson Education, Inc.
[9] Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed, terj. Achmad Fawaid. Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar.
[10] Darzhinova, L. (2019). Processing of Written Sentences on the Example of Russian-English Bilinguals. IRJE (Indonesian Research Journal in Education) , 3(2), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v3i2.8057
[11] Erlina, D., Marzulina, L., Astrid, A., Desvitasari, D., Sapriati, R. S., Amrina, R. D., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A. (2019). Linguistic intelligence of undergraduate EFL learners in higher education: A case study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 2143-2155. doi:10.13189/ujer.2019.071012
[12] Hammond, J. (2001). Scaffolding and language, dalam Scaffolding teaching and learning in language and literacy education, edited by Hammond, J. Australia: Teaching Association.
[13] Hammond, J. & Gibbons, P. (2001). What is Scaffolding?, dalam Scaffolding teaching and learning in language and literacy education, edited by Hammond, J. Australia: Teaching Association.
[14] Ibrahim, N., & Nambiar, R.M.K. (2012). Scaffoldings in academic writing: the role of intercultural rhetoric and genre analysis in academic socialization. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 438 – 442. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.298
[15] Imani, A & Habil, H. (2012). NNS Postgraduate Students’ Academic Writing: Problem-Solving es And Grammatical Features, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 460 – 471. Retrieved from http:// www.sciencedirect.com
[16] Kim, S. H. (2013) Metacognitive knowledge in second language writing (Doctoral dissertation) Michigan State University.
[17] Kurniasih, A. W. (2012) Scaffolding sebagai Alternatif Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematika, Jurnal Kreano, 3, 113-124.
[18] Lengyel, Z. (2019). Anagram Based L2 Activation. IRJE (Indonesian Research Journal in Education) , 3(2), 300-318. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v3i2.7834
[19] Lloyd, M. (2007). Developing academic writing skills: the PROCESS framework. Jurnal Nursing Standard, 21, 40, 50-56. Retrieved from http;//www. ProQuest.com
[20] Marzulina, L., Mukminin, A., Erlina, D., Astrid, A., Ajriyah, N., Holandiyah, M., & Habibi, A. (2019). The grammatical awareness of student teachers: The case of an english education study program in indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1847-1859. doi:10.13189/ujer.2019.070902
[21] Mukminin, A., Ali, R. M., & Ashari, M. J. F. (2015). Voices from within: Student teachers’ experiences in English academic writing socialization at one indonesian teacher training program. Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1394-1407.
[22] Nazurty, Rustam, Priyanto, Nurullaningsih, Pratiwi, A., Sarmandan, Habibi, A., Mukminin, A. (2019). Learning strategies in reading: The case of indonesian language education student teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(11), 2536-2543. doi:10.13189/ujer.2019.071133
[23] Padgett, S. C. (1982). Interdiciplinary Writing student Perception of the Role of Writing in University Classes. Disertasi Universitas Arizona.
[24] Pemen Ristekdikti RI Nomor 44 tahun 2015 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.
[25] Read, S. (2010). A Model for Scaffolding Writing Instruction: IMSCI. Journal of The Reading Teacher, 64, 47–
52. http://dx.doi.org /10.1598/RT.64.1.5
[26] Riazi, M., & Rezaii, M. (2011).Teacher and peer scaffolding behaviors: Effects on efl students’ writing improvement. Clesol 2010 Conference Proceedings, 55 – 63. Spring 2005 Vol. 16(2), 23-38.
[27] Sabet, M. K., Tahriri, A., & Pasand, P. G. (2013).The impact of peer scaffolding through process approach on efl learners’ academic writing fluency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, (10),1893 – 1901.
[28] Schraw, G. & Dennison, R., S. (1994). Assesing metacognition awareness, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
[29] Slameto (2010), Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[30] Sunendar, D., Cahyani, D., & Mulyadi, Y. 2014. Implementasi metode ecriture créative berbasis budaya lokal untuk meningkatkan keterampilan menulis bahasa perancis level b1 delf, Bahasa dan Sastra, 14, 229-241
[31] Suratno. (2011) Kemampuan metakognisi dengan metacognitive awareness inventory (mai) pada pembelajarn biologi sma dengan strategi jagsaw, reciprocal teaching (rt) dan gabungan jigsaw-rt, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 18 (1), 11-18.
[32] Veerappan, V. A/L; Suan, W. H. & Sulaiman, T. (2011). The Effect of Scaffolding Technique in Journal Writing among the Second Language Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4, 934-940.
[33] Yeh, S.-W., Lo, J.J., & Huang, J. J.. (2011). Scaffolding collaborative technical writing with procedural facilitation and synchronous discussion. Journal of Collaborative Learning, 6, 397–419. http://dx.doi.org / 10.1007/s11412-011-9117-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
