Indonesia Public Transportations: A Mapping What Needs to be Improved

Authors

  • Trisha Gilang Saraswati Telkom University, Indonesia Author
  • Jagat Batara Telkom University, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/hmpbf619

Keywords:

Public Transportation, Gap Analysis, Importance Performance Analysis

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the potential of Importance of Performance Analysis as a decision-making tool to assess the performance of Indonesia public transportation in delivering quality services.

Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected through questionnaire where the respondents were asked to provide importance and performance scores about Indonesia public transportation based on SERVQUAL model. In order to qualify the sample, individuals have used public transportation at least 1 time within the previous three months. The gap analysis and importance performance analysis maps were employed to analyze the data

Findings: 22 SERVQUAL indicators are mapped into the importance performance analysis diagram consisting of the concentrate here quadrant, keep up the good work quadrant, low priority quadrant and possible overkill quadrant where the quadrants show the level of performance and importance of every indicators.

Research limitations/implications: This study is focus on public transportation in Indonesia. Further research could focus on public transportation in other cities or countries.

Practical implications: A practical implication of the mentioned findings is that the mapping can be a decision- making tool for the government identifying and improve public transportation quality services.

Originality/value: Public transportation can use this approach to improve their service management by employed the result mapping.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Agrawal, A.W. (2015), What do americans think about public transit? A review of us public opinion polling survey questions, MTI Report WP 12-03, Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, CA

[2] Kotler, P., Keller, K. (2016). Marketing Management 16th edition. New Jersey: Pearson

[3] Magal, S., Levenburg, N. (2005). Using Importance Performance Analysis to evaluate e-business Strategies among small businesses. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Science.

[4] O’Connell, L., Brock, T.J., Blandford, B. and Yusuf, J.-E.W. (2017). Types of rail transit systems and the movement of the college educated into the center of large American cities. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

[5] O’Connell, L., (Wie) Yusuf, J. and Anuar, K. (2018). Beyond new roads and bridges: Understanding public preferences for investing in urban non-automobile transportation infrastructure. Journal of Public Budgeting,

Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 175-190

[6] Parasuraman, A. (2014). The Behaviorial Consequenses of Service Quality. New Jersey : Prentince Hall.

[7] Pohandry, A., Winarni, S. (2013). Analisis tingkat kepuasan pelanggan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Customer Satisfaction Index dan Importance Performance Analysis Serta Service Quality. Jurnal Rekavasi ISSN: 2338-7750

[8] Santos, A., McGuckin, N., Nakamoto, H.Y., Gray, D. and Liss, S. (2011), “Summary of travel trends: 2009 national household travel survey”, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

[9] Song Lee, B., Wohar, M.E. and Uhm, D. (2016), “Bus commuting, subway commuting, and walking to workplaces in US cities: socioeconomic factors of transit commuters”, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 10 No. 9, pp. 861-880.

[10] Qin, Z. (2008). Improving public transit access to in‐city villages. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 141‐52.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2020

How to Cite

Saraswati, T. G., & Batara, J. (2020). Indonesia Public Transportations: A Mapping What Needs to be Improved. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(7), 8208-8213. https://doi.org/10.61841/hmpbf619