Strategic Response to Industry 4.0; In the Perspective of Technology-Organization- Environment and Emotional Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/b8k9vh49Keywords:
Industry 4.0,, TOE framework,, Emotional intelligence, Industrial Revolution,, IT maturityAbstract
Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework is the organizational level theory that suggests the acceptance and implementation of new and advanced technologies in the organization. In this study, the strategic response to industry 4.0 has been focused. This study will answer; how organizations can strategically respond to industry 4.0, which is the latest industrial revolution. Moreover, this study has considered the emotional intelligence individual-level factor to implement new technologies in the organization, which will enable organizations to strategically response the industry 4.0
The population of this study is the Chinese manufacturing industry. The sample size is 250, which was collected through a simple random sampling method. Data has been collected through the survey method. The advanced statistical software PLS-SEM has used for structural equation modelling for analysis.
Structural equation modelling consists of two modellings; measurement model and structural model. In the measurement model, reliability and validity through Cronbach alpha, composite reliability, average variance extract (AVE), and factor loadings of data have been measured. After the measurement model structural model based on the path coefficient through explanatory factor (R2) with significant values has been mentioned. The results are in favour of the proposed model; only the moderating effect is contradicting, while emotional intelligence is playing its role as an independent variable instead of a moderating effect.
The advancement of IT technologies has evolved the industries into industry 3.0 to industry 4.0. Now a day’s organizations are using advanced technologies in their production and manufacturing, which has integrated all the machines and processes through networking, or the internet. It will change the production concept to smart production. So, the manufacturing organizations can survive only, if they respond to the industrial revolution towards the industry 4.0. This study has contributed to the literature through emotional intelligence and highlighted the most important technological, organizational, and environmental factors to respond to industry 4.0; those are more practically implemented in the manufacturing companies.
Downloads
References
1. Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014). Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 639-651.
2. Azmi, A., Sapiei, N. S., Mustapha, M. Z., & Abdullah, M. (2016). SMEs' tax compliance costs and IT adoption: the case of a value-added tax. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 23, 1-13.
3. Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in Industry 4.0.
Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195-2202.
4. Chan, F. T., Chong, A. Y.-L., & Zhou, L. (2012). An empirical investigation of factors affecting e- collaboration diffusion in SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 329-344.
5. Chang, S.-C., Lin, N.-P., Wea, C.-L., & Sheu, C. (2002). Aligning manufacturing capabilities with business strategy: An empirical study in high-tech industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 24(1), 70-87.
6. Chiu, C.-Y., Chen, S., & Chen, C.-L. (2017). An integrated perspective of TOE framework and innovation diffusion in broadband mobile applications adoption by enterprises. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS), 6(1), 14-39.
7. Corporation, E. S. (2020). What is Industry 4.0—the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT)? Retrieved from https://www.epicor.com/en-ae/resource-center/articles/what-is-industry-4-0/
8. Facts, S. I. (2020). Facts About Industry 4.0. Retrieved from https://someinterestingfacts.net/facts-industry-4- 0/
9. Foster, I., & Kesselman, C. (1997). Globus: A metacomputing infrastructure toolkit. The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications and High Performance Computing, 11(2), 115-128.
10. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
11. He, X., & Mu, Q. (2012). How Chinese firms learn technology from transnational corporations: A comparison of the telecommunication and automobile industries. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(3), 270- 287.
12. Henderson, D., Sheetz, S. D., & Trinkle, B. S. (2012). The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL: A structural equation model. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(2), 109-140.
13. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
14. Huang, Z., Janz, B. D., & Frolick, M. N. (2008). A comprehensive examination of Internet-EDI adoption.
Information Systems Management, 25(3), 273-286.
15. i-SCOOP. (2020). Industry 4.0: the fourth industrial revolution – guide to Industrie 4.0. Retrieved from https://www.i-scoop.eu/industry-4-0/
16. Kagermann, H. (2015). Change through digitization—Value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In
Management of permanent change (pp. 23-45): Springer.
17. Kamariah Kamaruddin, N., & Mohamed Udin, Z. (2009). Supply chain technology adoption in Malaysian automotive suppliers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(3), 385-403.
18. Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Kalvet, T. (2013). How Governments Support Innovation through Public Procurement. Comparing Evidence from 11 Countries.
19. Li, X., Li, D., Wan, J., Vasilakos, A. V., Lai, C.-F., & Wang, S. (2017). A review of industrial wireless networks in the context of industry 4.0. Wireless networks, 23(1), 23-41.
20. Lin, D., Lee, C., Lau, H., & Yang, Y. (2018). Strategic response to Industry 4.0: an empirical investigation on the Chinese automotive industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 589-605.
21. Liu, G. H., Wang, E., & Chua, C. E. H. (2015). Leveraging social capital to obtain top management support in complex, cross-functional IT projects. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(8), 707.
22. Masoni, R., Ferrise, F., Bordegoni, M., Gattullo, M., Uva, A. E., Fiorentino, M., . . . Di Donato, M. (2017). Supporting remote maintenance in industry 4.0 through augmented reality. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1296-1302.
23. Motyl, B., Baronio, G., Uberti, S., Speranza, D., & Filippi, S. (2017). How will change the future engineers’ skills in the Industry 4.0 framework? A questionnaire survey. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1501-1509.
24. Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & Berge, J. M. t. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226): McGraw-hill New York.
25. Ombaka, B., Machuki, V., & Mahasi, J. (2015). Organizational resources, external environment, innovation and firm performance: A critical review of literature.
26. Ostdick, N. (2018). 5 Little Known Facts About Industry 4.0. Retrieved from https://blog.flexis.com/5-little- known-facts-about-industry-4.0
27. Othman, R., Arshad, R., Aris, N. A., & Arif, S. M. M. (2015). Organizational resources and sustained competitive advantage of cooperative organizations in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 120-127.
28. Peter, P. C. (2010). Emotional intelligence. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing.
29. Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 623-656.
30. Pfohl, H.-C., Yahsi, B., & Kurnaz, T. (2015). The impact of Industry 4.0 on the Supply Chain. Paper presented at the Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 20.
31. Poonpakdee, P., Koiwanit, J., & Yuangyai, C. (2017). Decentralized network building change in large manufacturing companies towards Industry 4.0. Procedia computer science, 110, 46-53.
32. Poudel, B., & Munir, A. (2018). Design and Evaluation of a Reconfigurable ECU Architecture for Secure and Dependable Automotive CPS. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.
33. Reyes, P. M., Li, S., & Visich, J. K. (2016). Determinants of RFID adoption stage and perceived benefits.
European Journal of Operational Research, 254(3), 801-812.
34. Saldanha, T. J., & Krishnan, M. S. (2012). Organizational adoption of web 2.0 technologies: An empirical analysis. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 22(4), 301-333.
35. Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution Penguin Random House. In: UK.
36. Sin, K. Y., Osman, A., Salahuddin, S. N., Abdullah, S., Lim, Y. J., & Sim, C. L. (2016). Relative advantage and competitive pressure towards implementation of e-commerce: Overview of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 434-443.
37. Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American behavioral scientist, 43(3), 377-391.
38. Theorin, A., Bengtsson, K., Provost, J., Lieder, M., Johnsson, C., Lundholm, T., & Lennartson, B. (2017). An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 55(5), 1297-1311.
39. Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation: Lexington books.
40. Tupa, J., Simota, J., & Steiner, F. (2017). Aspects of risk management implementation for Industry 4.0.
Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1223-1230.
41. Unger, H., Börner, F., & Müller, E. (2017). Context related information provision in Industry 4.0 environments. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 796-805.
42. Verhoest, K., Petersen, O. H., Scherrer, W., & Soecipto, R. M. (2015). How do governments support the development of public private partnerships? Measuring and comparing PPP governmental support in 20 European countries. Transport Reviews, 35(2), 118-139.
43. Weyer, S., Meyer, T., Ohmer, M., Gorecky, D., & Zühlke, D. (2016). Future modeling and simulation of CPS-based factories: an example from the automotive industry. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(31), 97-102.
44. Wong, C.-S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The leadership quarterly, 13(3), 243-274.
45. Yigitbasioglu, O. M. (2015). The role of institutional pressures and top management support in the intention to adopt cloud computing solutions. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(4), 579-594.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
