Corporate Digital Responsibility: Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/ymsqh857Keywords:
Corporate digital responsibility (CDR), Digital technologies, Data Ethics, Privacy Organizational cultureAbstract
Increasing the prevalence of digital technologies and related data, and that ethical concerns arise as a result. Looking at four main stakeholders and propose a novel concept in the field of corporate digital responsibility (CDR). Under this paper CDR is defines as the set of shared values and standards which guide the operations of an organization in relation to four main processes related to digital technology and data. Such methods are the creation of technology and data collection, activity and decision-making, review and effect evaluation, and technology and data refining. Discussion is expanded our by highlighting how to manage behavior that is compliant with CDR based on a perspective of organizational culture. Our conceptualization opens possibilities for future research, particularly with regard to specific contexts and implications. Managingly, we shed first light on how the shared values and standards of an organization regarding CDR can be translated into user-friendly guidelines. It offers foundations for future discussions on planning, deployment and progress of CDRs.
Downloads
References
[1] L. Y. Chan, “Corporate social responsibility of multinational corporations,” UW Tacoma Digit. Commons - Univ. Washingt. Tacoma, 2014.
[2] L. Lobschat et al., “Corporate digital responsibility,” J. Bus. Res., 2019.
[3] S. Mccallum, M. A. Schmid, P. Ferreira, and T. Barkay, “Social Responsibility Journal,” Soc. Responsib. J. Soc. Responsib. J. Iss J. Work. Learn. Empl. Relations, 2012.
[4] M. Etter, C. Fieseler, and G. Whelan, “Sharing Economy, Sharing Responsibility? Corporate Social Responsibility in the Digital Age,” J. Bus. Ethics, 2019.
[5] I. Duca and R. Gherghina, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Business,” Int. J. Innov. Digit. Econ., 2018.
[6] L. Dagiliene, “The research of corporate social responsibility disclosures in annual reports,” Eng. Econ., 2010.
[7] L. Illia, S. Romenti, B. Rodríguez-Cánovas, G. Murtarelli, and C. E. Carroll, “Exploring Corporations’ Dialogue About CSR in the Digital Era,” J. Bus. Ethics, 2017.
[8] J. Tan and A. E. Tan, “Business Under Threat, Technology Under Attack, Ethics Under Fire: The Experience of Google in China,” J. Bus. Ethics, 2012.
[9] D. Conversi, “Irresponsible Radicalisation: Diasporas, Globalisation and Long-Distance Nationalism in the Digital Age,” J. Ethn. Migr. Stud., 2012.
[10] “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Digital Age,” 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
